|
Paul
Hornshemeier,
The Three Paradoxes (Fantagraphics,
2007). $14.95, hardcover.
by
Jared
Gardner
Like many fans of
Hornschemier’s earlier short work in
Sequential
and
Forlorn
Funnies (the latter of which
has been collected recently in Let us Be
Perfectly Clear and in his first
graphic novel Mother, Come
Home), I have been
waiting a long time for this new book, which has been
very slow in coming. And like a lot of us, I get
grouchy when I have to wait a long time. Women
suddenly don’t look so hot, food doesn’t taste so
good, and graphic novels seem similarly hardly worth
the agita. So I had to put down The Three
Paradoxes for a while until my
temper cooled, not wanting to break up with yet
another long-term relationship in a fit of pique. On
cool reflection, I am glad I counted to ten,
as The Three
Paradoxes is a smart
and very
handsome
book (qualities not to be cast aside too quickly).
And while Hornshemeier remains still too close to his
parents (in this case Ware and Clowes), the makings
of an independent, long-term relationship are as
strong as ever.
Especially promising for me is the fact that
Hornshemeier is going to be turning more attention in
the coming month to the short work featured in
Let
Us Be Perfectly Clear, reviving
his Forlorn
Funnies for a new run from
Fantagraphics. Because in a sense, it is the short
form work contained within The Three
Paradoxes that is the best.
Hornshemeier has developed into a remarkable
draftsman, and his ability to sample different styles
is a pleasure to behold – nowhere more than in his
dead-on parody of the Dell Four-Color
Comics
from the
1950s. Here Hornshemeier tells the story of Zeno and
his amazing paradoxes, as Zeno attempts to defend his
(and his lover Paraminides’) monism and refusal of
the concept of temporal change through a serious of
ingenious paradoxes. The pages are a brilliant set
piece and could stand on their own as a piece in a
larger collection of short pieces, and part of me
wishes that this is where I encountered
Hornshemeier’s Zeno. In The Three
Paradoxes it serves as a
somewhat hyperbolic metaphor for our autobiographical
protagonist’s struggles to make sense of his future
(new city, new girlfriend, new career) against his
past (solid, small town Ohio, solid small-time
parents, painful childhood memories). His childhood
memories are told in a poorly printed 1960s Sunday
comicstrip style, while his adult life is drawn with
the impeccable lines of father Clowes and the
increasingly imitable palette of father Ware.
Hornshemeier uses a fourth style in the pages his
autobiographical self is struggling with on his
parents’ kitchen table – a weak-kneed cutesy parable
about Paul and his Magic Pencil, which understandably
is going nowhere for our hero.
There is great pleasure found in this book’s virtuoso
displays, and as a kind of coming-of-age book for
Hornshemeier announcing how far his has developed as
a cartoonist from his earlier Sequential
work,
the book succeeds in every way. But to return to my
earlier overbearing date-metaphor, there is a bit of
the Sensitive Sleaze about the book that makes me
willing to take it home but unlikely to introduce it
to my mother: superficially profound, a bit too fond
of its grooming and proud of its clothes. The book
was worth the wait, but now I feel that I am waiting
once again for the great book that I know that
Hornshemeier has in him. Hey, he’s cute. I’m willing
to sit him out.
|